| Forums | Register | Reply | Search | Statistics | Manual |
Main Forum Booru / Main Forum /

What do you guys consider loli?

Page  Page 2 of 13:  « Previous  1  2  3  4  5  ...  9  10  11  12  13  Next »  
Author Guest
#16 | Posted: 16 Mar 2011 02:57 
Yet there is a booru centered specifically around lolicon.
Author slayerduck
Admin
#17 | Posted: 16 Mar 2011 22:40 
Guest:
Yet there is a booru centered specifically around lolicon.

what do you mean? what booru?
Author Kielan
Registered
#18 | Posted: 17 Mar 2011 02:04 
Haha thats like saying there is a booru centered around snuff porn or something and then not saying where it is, unless you back up what you say, it's meaningless, it's a complete waste of time and makes you look rather foolish, if you mean booru's with loli in their name, that dont mean jack, there's no loli in them, ergo no problem.
Author Guest
#19 | Posted: 18 Mar 2011 03:22 
Kielan:
Those under 18 do not wear lingerie

Yes they do.
Children don't, but there are plenty of 16-year-olds that wear lacy bras.
Author Kielan
Registered
#20 | Posted: 19 Mar 2011 05:12 
Guest:
Yes they do.
Children don't, but there are plenty of 16-year-olds that wear lacy bras.

If your under 18 your classed as a child in the eyes of the law, under 18's may not be in porn, nor have any images that are sexual in nature, such as showing off lingerie, displayed upon websites, the same applies to hentai in certain countries.

Yes there are no doubt some 16 year olds that wear lacie bras and indeed wear lingerie, that is staggeringly obvious, but it still does not change the rules and laws we have to abide by, my post is written from the laws point of view, it is not correct nor reasonable in my opinion, but it is totally pointless debating it with us as we cannot change it.
Author Guest
#21 | Posted: 10 Apr 2011 15:23 
So where is the line?

I mean this is just sugestive more than anything else right?


NSFW
http://lolibooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=59960

Ecchi counts/dismissed?
Author Guest
#22 | Posted: 10 Apr 2011 15:51 
sorry i have to post again to ask about oppai loli? Does that count they are only half loli and either impossible or have wierd hormone disbalance or shit in reality?

and also no joke but what about that medical condition that causes growth to stop in your earlyer years (cant remeber its name) because i think we could have strong argument for discrimination there! everything below here is random ranting... dont read unless your bored.

No realy! you can say so its alright for you to bum your mates but i cant have a relationship with a short statured person!? ANYHOW arent most of the laws if you are in possetion of an image? so if you dont save anything or have a no save policy then you are fine?
and also i have a friend who is 21 and she has to give proof of age to go see a 12 film! therefore there are limitations and deviations from the course depending on artistic style. Such as if i shave my beard off i look less like a terrorist but more like a babyfaced idiot.
AND what about pregnant women having sex isnt that like super version of loli? NOT EVEN BORN AND IN A SEXUAL SITUATION!? thats plain wrong right!?
back on track though seriosly loli is such a hard line to see what about short arses with no tits? and having cancer treatment so their hair fell out?
Also robo lolis? not as in cyborgs but full on robots with child like apearence technicaly that isnt depiction of somthing underage is it now?

Rant end
Author Kielan
Registered
#23 | Posted: 15 Apr 2011 03:44 
sorry i have to post again to ask about oppai loli? Does that count they are only half loli and either impossible or have wierd hormone disbalance or shit in reality?

Thats when the law is really vague, as I understand it from reading up on it, it seems if any of the genitailia are underaged, then it's considered illegal, so if you happen to put big boobies on a childs body, it is still a child in the eyes of the law.

what about that medical condition that causes growth to stop in your earlyer years (cant remeber its name) because i think we could have strong argument for discrimination there! everything below here is random ranting... dont read unless your bored.

If your body looks like a child and is taken a picture of even though your over 18 its considered child porn, same goes for art, for example Mina the vampire is many hundreds of years old in anime, yet in some countries her nudity or partial nudity is illegal because she has the body of a 12 year old.

No realy! you can say so its alright for you to bum your mates but i cant have a relationship with a short statured person!?

You can if she is over the age limit, but if she looks underaged it would not be wise to take any pics of her.

Also robo lolis? not as in cyborgs but full on robots with child like apearence technicaly that isnt depiction of somthing underage is it now?

The law thinks anything like that is simply trying to work around the law and they will probably take it as a depiction of a child anyway.

AND what about pregnant women having sex isnt that like super version of loli?


Until a child is born, it is not a child but a life, therefore it is not covered by the law yet.


I could say that laws against underage art is crazy, I could say that these laws are called for by over protecting mothers who dont want to have the responcibility of looking after their own children.

I could point out that most risk to your child comes from a relative or someone you know very well and not to a stranger who appreciates art of the young human form, that your child is a hundred thousand times more likely to be killed than molested, by that death machine you drive called a car.

I could point out that responcibility for a child resides soley with the parent and that them passing the buck on that responcibility is due to them being overworked and the colapse of the family unit thanks to capatalism and the government taking over in family life.

But such dangerous and subversive opinions, I could never claim to be my opinions as the authorities like to monitor that type of dangerous thinking and indeed eventually silence them.

I hope my answers are however illuminating.
Author Kielan
Registered
#24 | Posted: 15 Apr 2011 04:19 | Edited by: Kielan 
So where is the line?

I mean this is just sugestive more than anything else right?


A girl eating a popsicle is fine, thats a natural thing for a girl to do, a girl sucking on a dick shaped popsicle is not.

Anything sexual thats blatently been forced by an adult is loli, clothed is less to worry about, any bare genitals (vagina, chest, ass) showing is a big no no, even when the art depicts a child doing natural things, it will get you banned.

Less clothed art of a child can be ok, example art of a girl swimming in a full swim suit is fine, however a girl with her legs spread showing off her cameltoe is not, or bent over provocatively etc.

A piece of art with a child in lingerie is not ok because lingerie is sexual and sexualisation of an under 18 art subject is a no no in some countries, ergo its a no no with us.

Basically just use your common sence, in some countries art is treated as real as photographs now, therefore ask yourself is it ok if I uploaded a photo of this.

Imagine an old fart is looking at the art your uploading of a clothed child, if they would consider it a kid doing normal kid things and perfectly natural and decent, then it's probbaly ok, if they would frown and think it innapropriate, it's likely to be an image we'd just remove it and maybe warn you depending on how bad it was, again art of a nude or partialy nude minor will most likely lead to a ban.

I'm sure slayerduck will correct me if anything stated is not in line with booru rules :)
Author slayerduck
Admin
#25 | Posted: 15 Apr 2011 08:47 
Kielan:
I'm sure slayerduck will correct me if anything stated is not in line with booru rules :)

How could i ever do this, the essay you wrote is perfectly fine!
Author Proger_XP
Registered
#26 | Posted: 15 Apr 2011 10:14 
Yeah, Kielan seems to be a pro in this kind of law matters o_O
Author Neku
Registered
#27 | Posted: 17 Apr 2011 00:19 
I think i don't have loli in my booru, but, if i have any pictures, please admin's, dont delete the booru, only post in the picture and I delete it, please ^^-.

Thanks :D
Author Kielan
Registered
#28 | Posted: 17 Apr 2011 17:11 
We usually only delete booru's who have multiple violations, ie. they really dont seem to care about the rules, for minor stuff we usually just remove the image, if it happens again we will poke you in message or leave a nice post on your forum reminding you :)

So yeah we always give the benefit of the doubt before taking action unless its blatently done on purpose.
Author Neku
Registered
#29 | Posted: 17 Apr 2011 17:56 
Ok, thanks you Kielan :D, and no problem, i don't go to upload loli vioaltion pictures or something like that xD
Author Guest
#30 | Posted: 23 Apr 2011 19:03 
I'm Really against this loliban. I know that over here, the FBI would arrest you if it was real child porn, not fake. So what gives?
If I can't post loli, you didn't say much about shota. So I could post it because it isn't little girls having sex.
Page  Page 2 of 13:  « Previous  1  2  3  4  5  ...  9  10  11  12  13  Next » 
Main Forum Booru / Main Forum / What do you guys consider loli? Top
Your Reply Click this icon to move up to the quoted message
 

 ?
You are welcome to post anonymously, by entering a nickname with no password (if the similar Username has not been taken yet), or by leaving both fields empty. If you have a forums account, you can also sign in from this page without posting a message, or sign in and post at once.
[ANTISPAM] Enter letter "U" here:
 
  Booru Powered by Forum Script miniBB ®